As occasionally happens,
I cross paths with an author through a mutual writing friend – or in this case,
a writing/blogging friend -- and recently met Ellen
Cassedy via our mutual connection to Erika
Dreifus. Ellen is the author of We Are Here: Memories of the
Lithuanian Holocaust, recently
published by University
of Nebraska Press, a source of so much rich and wonderful nonfiction. Her
memoir chronicles what began as a personal journey to Lithuania to poke around
in her family's Jewish history. That took on a much larger and more urgent
scope as she uncovered unexpected truths and dug further, simultaneously
excavating ancestral stories and exploring how a country and culture moves on
from an unthinkable past. She lives in Washington, D.C.
Please welcome Ellen
Cassedy
Lately
I have been pondering what I adore about my favorite memoirs. It is the balance
of the personal and the universal, I’ve decided – an individual life rubbing up
against the sweep of history. I love writing that offers me an intimate vantage
point from which to learn about a larger world – another culture or another
era.
Both
as a reader and as a writer, I find that a memoir’s vibration between big and
small is more than just a pleasure. It is also a political and a moral matter. When
family stories are told in a larger context, we learn a fundamental truth: that human history is made not only by
generals and kings, but by each and every one of us.
So,
paradoxically, my advice to fellow memoir-writers goes in two opposite
directions: 1) Come closer; and 2) Step
back.
1) Come closer. Just like a work of fiction or a play, a
memoir needs vivid scenes and vivid characters. A memoir sometimes needs to
slow down and draw the reader in close – close enough to be right on the spot, minute
by minute, soaking up all there is to see, hear, smell.
As
I gathered material for We Are Here, my
account of my journey into the land of my Jewish forebears, I kept a diary – a
total of nine spiral notebooks, in which I scribbled down observations,
impressions, and feelings. I also took nine rolls of film (remember rolls of
film, before the digital age?)
Once
I was at my desk, conjuring up the encounter with the old man in my ancestral
town who wanted to speak to a Jew before he died (and wanted me to be that
Jew), I could tell my readers all about his green cap, his aluminum cane, and
the blood-red gladioli that framed the door of his tin-roofed cottage.
Also
like a work of fiction, memoirs require vivid characters whom the reader can
cozy up to. With a first-person narrative, that means creating yourself as a character. As the reader’s guide through a difficult
moral terrain, I had to work hard to make myself into a someone readers could
feel close to. My character had to be just as sharp and memorable as Uncle Will,
with his complex secret from his Holocaust past, or Ruta, the passionate young
woman driving a Holocaust exhibit around the country in her pickup truck.
2) Step back. For a family story to become a book, detachment
is vital. When I first sat down to write, what was on my mind were my own
feelings: how agitated I felt when my
uncle revealed his secret, how perplexed I felt when I learned about the old
man who wanted to speak to a Jew before he died.
But
only when my own story came to illuminate something larger was it launched it
on its way toward publication. By stepping back, I widened the lens, placing my
family story within the broader context of a nation’s encounter with its
“family secrets,” its Jewish past. My
book became not only a personal journey but also an inquiry into how people in
a country scarred by genocide were seeking to build a more tolerant future.
Detachment
also helped me understand what did and did not belong in the manuscript. In writing my story, I found I was less a
builder than a sculptor. I had to carve away what wasn’t needed. That meant even my discovery of my great-grandfather’s
grave had to go. Deeply moving though it
was, it didn’t advance what had become the real story.
(Don’t
throw away those scraps that end up on the cutting-room floor, though. You may find a place for them in something
else you write.)
It
is the balance of big and small that makes me care about someone else’s family
story. What about you? What makes you care?
Notes from Lisa: Ellen will be stopping by the blog
periodically today and tomorrow to respond to your questions and comments. After,
you can continue leaving comments until midnight on April 29 to be entered in a
random drawing for a free signed copy of her book. (Must have a U.S. postal address.)
Ellen
is also offering to share a copy of a handout she prepared for her panel at the
recent AWP conference, entitled “Your Family Stories: Ten Ways to Make
Your Readers Care.” To request one, use this contact form. You can read an excerpt from her memoir here.
6 comments:
I think you are right, feeling close to the narrator is important for me, if I am going to invest in a story.
I also like your idea of keeping the scraps for use in other works. The notion makes the the cutting seem less painful.
Wonderfully stated. There are some contemporary memories that I feel don't practice this. They don't find the universal because they seem too caught up in their own drama.
Thanks for commenting. I think every memoir writer finds the balance of the big and the small in her own way. It's helpful to me to hear how other writers are handling this important issue.
This post comes at a perfect time for me, as I am trying now to step back from my own family stories and figure out how to make them resonate with readers. Your ideas are very helpful. Thank you for sharing your experience.
It is a challenge to write about people you know in a detached, objective way -- to send them out into the world as characters readers will respond to. The hardest character to create is my own, as the narrator.
Congratulations, Julie! You are the winner of a signed copy of Ellen's book.
Please contact me with your postal address. Thanks for reading and commenting.
Post a Comment